Talking
about Quotes from Gerri August, Annemarie Vaccaro, and Megan S. Kennedy’s Safe
Spaces – Making Schools and Communities Welcoming to LGBT Youth
I was going
to do reflection writing on this article but I fear it may turn into a very
long tangent on my part. Plus, there are some really profound quotes in this
piece about human beings. I cannot believe people still believe that someone’s
sexual orientation can be classified as wrong or worst, as a few examples were
shown in this piece. That being said, as teachers, balancing what we believe
should be taught against parents own beliefs that they have instilled in their
children is probably the greatest struggle we have to face.
I was reminded of this fact when I
read how Marley used interpretation in her class to show how a teacher from a
state who has actually passed a law accepting same sex marriages is in a
lawsuit for reading a story about a same sex family. One student in the class
says that she things it’s a perverse act because it’s unnatural to love someone
of the same sex and that showing that child teaches them that it’s okay. Truly,
it kills me that this is still happening. What’s worse is that this student was
college aged and was a teacher candidate! I want to be the kind of teacher that
challenges the status quo but how can I do
so without jeopardizing my livelihood? This article shared a few techniques by
teachers who also wanted to bend the status quo assumptions.
In fact, teachers can use “the study
of family [to] either reinforce or interrupt heteronormative beliefs and attitudes”
but instead “they teach their students the status quo”, which is the heterosexual
idea of marriage. (pg. 85) Why? Because you put your job on the line to do so
as Marley proved above. By ignoring these types of families, we are not acknowledging
the world around us. We are forgetting about the children who are part of these
families. Why should it become a debate as to whether or not they should have
their family represented under the term of family? It is the teachers who have
the platform to bring such things to attention. You don’t have to share your opinion
on the subject but you should present all forms of families, in every shape and
size. I believe that even though these authors don’t spell this out (because
they believe you should show your students that it isn’t wrong or abnormal)
this is the message they are trying to transmit. Uncover these truths and say
then say the words!
The part of this piece that got to
me the most was when Maria said that when she got her graded paper back that
told her that the answer to the question on if she had a sweetheart wasn’t
novia (female for sweetheart) but rather novio (the masculine) because she was
a girl. “Did it always have to be a choice of denying herself or explaining herself?”
(pg. 89) The teacher’s assumption that she was heterosexual gave way to bigotry
and made Maria question whether she should have to suppress her true answer for
the status quo one. You are who you are so why should Maria have to explain her
answer to the teacher to show that she wasn’t wrong to write novia? She shouldn’t.
But then again, how does a teacher grade accurately if she doesn’t know that Maria’s sexual orientation actually makes her answer correct?
Should it ever matter when it’s the difference between an “a” or an "o”? I
say no.
When Zeke shares the homosexual
family children books in his classroom, he does so because he felt that “the
students need to know that LGBT individuals are not a threat to their
well-being.” (pg. 90) He does this by sharing books that depict families full
of tender love and care. Here he teaches his students that there if nothing to
fear because although the families genetic makeup is different, their love isn’t,
their support system isn’t and so the family, although looks different, isn’t
different at all. Zeke breaks through the confines of the status quo to show
his students that families that look different are still families that are good
and safe places to be a part of.
Marley, Maria and Zeke all show the
power that words hold but actually using words that fall outside of the status
quo. Marley and Zeke both know that “words invite or exclude, recognize or
erase, empower or intimidate, examine or assume” not only in their classrooms
but outside of it too. (pg. 95) All three of them show us how true it is that “words
are sticks and stones and that they can either build bridges or break bones.”
(pg. 95) Word choice is most powerfully shown in the story of Maria’s test
where her novia sweetheart answer is refuted by her teacher, a teacher she
probably respects and may even look up to. This is Maria’s story shows why we
need to say the words instead of ignoring them. Broadening the gap of
assumptions by using instead partner and parent instead of girlfriend or
boyfriend or husband or wife or significant other and mom or dad or grandmother
or grandfather or aunt or uncle so that the children of these constantly evolving
families feel included in the simplest of luxuries; the people they call home!
Discussion Points for Class:
·
Is it wrong to try to stop assumptions of heterosexuality by
using the terms that leave our preference vague like our partner or parent or
does that actually add to the covering up of” using the words?”
·
School is supposed to be a place where we teach our students
about social justice in the way of tolerance. Are we as teachers out of line
when we share our opinions about such subjects as LGBT families? Or should we just
share the fact that there are different kinds of families and leave it at that?
Picture Links:
http://adamdyork.files.wordpress.com/2012/05/status-quo.jpg
http://www.sparkpeople.com/blog_photos/main/BigImages/familyG.jpg
http://gaybymama.files.wordpress.com/2012/07/rainbowfamilies-people.jpg
http://anthology.typepad.com/.a/6a00e552062b7e88330163000af41d970d-320wi
http://adamdyork.files.wordpress.com/2012/05/status-quo.jpg
http://www.sparkpeople.com/blog_photos/main/BigImages/familyG.jpg
http://gaybymama.files.wordpress.com/2012/07/rainbowfamilies-people.jpg
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjM7RphrGaTcJAbnA2zW6Ry6SAuxtiTeiMk121WYVpkS-_G2LIb6MQxPYDAQOo_kPTn7slbrawZMX2AzmSH87PYyzClgUE4pzQ9Ne8WaXZ5XT_Cgh-yBgcVIbetLNTfZp3Ak5Y8sU0QxeKC/s1600/WORDS.jpg
Jocelyn,
ReplyDeleteAs always your paper comes out to say what I'm thinking. I agree how can we teach the truth when the truth is not often accepted?
-Shanelle
EXCELLENT post. I really enjoyed reading this -- not because you support the claim August makes, but because you work to unpack it with external resources as well.
ReplyDeleteHi Jocelyn,
ReplyDeleteFirst off I wanted to thank you for the encouraging words on my blog! I love reading your comments because they always seem to shed light on our future impact as teachers! :)
Secondly, As I was reading your post I kept going back to one question that you asked: "I want to be the kind of teacher that challenges the status quo but how can I do so without jeopardizing my livelihood?" This is such a sad question!!!!! It makes me so upset that we have to fear sharing the reality with our children or better yet sharing the different lives of all the students in our class! It's scary to know that we could be reprimanded or even worse, fired, for talking about the different types of families that our children come from.
As usual, I loved reading your post and am looking forward to further discussing it in class tomorrow.
~Dorothy